This strategy enters once price action beraks through the range of the last 20 candles, while accompanied with elevated trading volume. It exits once price closes below an SMA(20). The idea is to follow trends, riding momentum confirmed by volume.
Backtest covers 12.5 months of GLD β’ 10 Minutes (SPDR Gold Trust) data, from July 16, 2024 to July 25, 2025.
Equity curve is the strategy's performance over time. You should compare it to the asset's Buy & Hold performance. In general, you want the blue area to be well above the gray area.
Drawdown is how much losses (realized or unrealized) the strategy has had if compared to the highest equity peak. Compare this to the asset's drawdown to see whether your strategy does a decent job of isolating you from downside volatility. In general, the red area must be well within the gray area.
So, we have backtested Range breakout on 12.5 months of GLD β’ 10 Minutes candles.Β This backtest resulted in 202 positions, with the average win rate of 37% and reward-risk ratio of 2.18.Β If you assume that 2.18 reward-to-risk ratio holds, you need a minimum win rate of 31.4 to be profitable. So you're looking good so far.Β The key metrics are as follows:
With that exposure in mind, you can tell that for 38% time-in-market, you get 26.26% of the asset upside potential, and 65.06% of the asset downside potential.
All of the following: # Papa 10min Chart(high) > 10min Range (20, 0), High (1 candles ago) All of the following: (within 5 candles) 10min Relative Volume (20, SMA, 1) > 1.5
All of the following: # Delta 10min Chart(close) < 10min Range (20, 0), Middle
Ze strategy shows some interesting characteristics, but I am not fully convinced. Let me explain why.
Ze positive aspects are ze good risk management metrics - a healthy Risk/Reward ratio of 2.18 and relatively low drawdown of 5.4% compared to asset's 8.3%. Ze win rate leeway is also quite good, giving us 5.6% buffer above ze minimal required win rate. Ze volatility exposure looks also quite controlled with beta of 0.25.
However, I have serious concerns about ze overall effectiveness. Ze total return of 9.4% significantly underperforms ze buy & hold return of 35.8%. Zis is problematic because we want our active strategy to beat passive investing, otherwise why bother? Ze win rate of 37% seems quite low, even though mathematically it works because of ze good R/R ratio. Also ze maximum losing streak of 8 trades could be psychologically challenging for most traders to handle in real conditions.
Ze strategy seems to be mathematically viable but not optimal. I would suggest optimizing ze entry conditions to improve ze win rate while maintaining ze good risk metrics. Perhaps adjusting ze volume threshold or adding momentum filters could help. But as it stands now, I cannot recommend trading zis strategy live.
Total Trades | 202 | Net Profit | 9.4% | Buy & Hold Profit | 35.8% |
Win Rate | 37% | Reward/Risk Ratio | 2.18 | Max Drawdown | -5.4% |
Asset Max Drawdown | -8.3% | Exposure | 38.2% | Avg Candles in Position | 17.9 |
Sharpe Ratio | 0.44 | Sortino Ratio | 0.96 | Realized Volatility | 8.60% |
Max Winning Streak | 4 | Avg Winning Streak | 1.6 | Max Losing Streak | 8 |
Avg Losing Streak | 2.7 | Avg Trades per Month | 32.4 | Avg Trades per Day | 1.1 |
Return Std Dev | 0.6 | Loss Std Dev | 0.3 | Win Std Dev | 0.6 |
Expectancy | 0.2 | Beta | 0.25 |
backtest | exposure | peformance vs asset | drawdown vs asset | win% | reward/risk |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
BTCUSDT β’ 1 Minute | 26% | (0.4%/-0.5%) -0.80x | (-2.3%/-4.5%) 0.51x | 46 | 1.3 |
EURUSD β’ 1 Minute | 22% | (-0.5%/0.9%) -0.56x | (-0.6%/-0.7%) 0.86x | 22 | 2.8 |
GLD β’ 1 Minute | 32% | (0.6%/-1.4%) -0.43x | (-1.9%/-4.1%) 0.46x | 38 | 1.8 |
NVDA β’ 1 Minute | 25% | (7.8%/20.4%) 0.38x | (-3.7%/-5.3%) 0.70x | 34 | 3.0 |
PLTR β’ 1 Minute | 28% | (1.3%/15.0%) 0.09x | (-5.4%/-12.9%) 0.42x | 36 | 1.9 |
SPY β’ 1 Minute | 32% | (1.6%/6.6%) 0.24x | (-1.1%/-1.5%) 0.73x | 35 | 2.4 |
TSLA β’ 1 Minute | 26% | (0.7%/-0.2%) -3.50x | (-12.8%/-19.2%) 0.67x | 35 | 1.9 |
WMT β’ 1 Minute | 31% | (-0.5%/3.3%) -0.15x | (-3.2%/-5.1%) 0.63x | 32 | 2.0 |
BTCUSDT β’ 10 Minutes | 33% | (10.5%/14.3%) 0.73x | (-4.9%/-12.1%) 0.40x | 36 | 2.4 |
EURUSD β’ 10 Minutes | 23% | (1.1%/1.8%) 0.61x | (-1.2%/-4.3%) 0.28x | 39 | 1.8 |
GLD β’ 10 Minutes | 38% | (9.4%/35.8%) 0.26x | (-5.4%/-8.3%) 0.65x | 37 | 2.2 |
NVDA β’ 10 Minutes | 30% | (19.8%/37.4%) 0.53x | (-28.5%/-42.8%) 0.67x | 46 | 1.4 |
PLTR β’ 10 Minutes | 31% | (43.5%/467.7%) 0.09x | (-32.3%/-46.5%) 0.69x | 40 | 1.9 |
SPY β’ 10 Minutes | 33% | (5.1%/13.1%) 0.39x | (-9.7%/-20.7%) 0.47x | 39 | 1.8 |
TSLA β’ 10 Minutes | 28% | (30.7%/25.4%) 1.21x | (-21.4%/-55.3%) 0.39x | 40 | 1.9 |
WMT β’ 10 Minutes | 32% | (23.2%/39.5%) 0.59x | (-5.3%/-23.8%) 0.22x | 41 | 2.1 |
BTCUSDT β’ 1 Hour | 34% | (0.5%/70.3%) 0.01x | (-18.7%/-30.6%) 0.61x | 34 | 2.0 |
EURUSD β’ 1 Hour | 30% | (1.6%/7.1%) 0.23x | (-6.8%/-9.0%) 0.76x | 34 | 2.1 |
GLD β’ 1 Hour | 38% | (39.3%/122.5%) 0.32x | (-19.5%/-22.2%) 0.88x | 39 | 2.2 |
NVDA β’ 1 Hour | 44% | (555.6%/3243.4%) 0.17x | (-52.5%/-68.0%) 0.77x | 46 | 2.1 |
PLTR β’ 1 Hour | 38% | (449.7%/1466.7%) 0.31x | (-56.3%/-86.6%) 0.65x | 43 | 2.4 |
SPY β’ 1 Hour | 36% | (28.0%/107.0%) 0.26x | (-17.4%/-35.1%) 0.50x | 40 | 2.0 |
TSLA β’ 1 Hour | 39% | (1353.0%/1305.7%) 1.04x | (-40.8%/-75.1%) 0.54x | 39 | 3.1 |
WMT β’ 1 Hour | 33% | (60.9%/145.2%) 0.42x | (-15.7%/-26.9%) 0.58x | 39 | 2.4 |
BTCUSDT β’ Daily | 35% | (549.0%/1346.8%) 0.41x | (-54.7%/-76.6%) 0.71x | 47 | 3.3 |
GLD β’ Daily | 32% | (83.3%/592.8%) 0.14x | (-21.7%/-45.3%) 0.48x | 48 | 1.8 |
NVDA β’ Daily | 32% | (6469.1%/396269.9%) 0.02x | (-55.8%/-90.0%) 0.62x | 50 | 2.7 |
SPY β’ Daily | 22% | (90.1%/1344.4%) 0.07x | (-15.9%/-56.7%) 0.28x | 49 | 2.3 |
TSLA β’ Daily | 30% | (2791.1%/24273.6%) 0.11x | (-42.7%/-75.0%) 0.57x | 42 | 4.8 |
WMT β’ Daily | 30% | (30.4%/10116.3%) 0.00x | (-67.6%/-50.6%) 1.34x | 39 | 1.8 |