13/26 EMA crosslong
Backtest-Ergebnisse @ EURUSD • 1 Hour

Die Moving Average Crossover Strategie verwendet zwei gleitende Durchschnitte unterschiedlicher Perioden, um Kauf- und Verkaufssignale zu generieren. Sie nähert sich der Idee eines trendigen Marktes durch die Verwendung von 2 exponentiellen gleitenden Durchschnitten, einem kurzen schnellen EMA(13) und einem anderen langsamen längeren EMA(26). Sie kauft, wenn ein kurzer EMA(13) einen langen EMA(26) nach oben kreuzt, was impliziert, dass sich die Richtung des Marktes geändert hat. Sie verkauft, sobald ein kurzer EMA(13) einen langen EMA(26) nach unten kreuzt.

Eigenkapitalkurve

Der Backtest umfasst 19.5 months von EURUSD • 1 Hour () Daten, von November 27, 2023 bis July 6, 2025.

Die Eigenkapitalkurve zeigt die Leistung der Strategie im Zeitverlauf. Sie sollten sie mit der Buy & Hold Performance des Assets vergleichen. Im Allgemeinen sollte der blaue Bereich deutlich über dem grauen Bereich liegen.

Drawdown zeigt, wie viel Verluste (realisiert oder nicht realisiert) die Strategie im Vergleich zum höchsten Eigenkapitalpeak hatte. Vergleichen Sie dies mit dem Drawdown des Assets, um zu sehen, ob Ihre Strategie eine anständige Arbeit leistet, Sie von Abwärtsvolatilität zu isolieren. Im Allgemeinen muss der rote Bereich gut innerhalb des grauen Bereichs liegen.

Eigenkapitalkurve
Strategie
Asset
Strategie Drawdown
Asset Drawdown

Also haben wir 13/26 EMA cross über 19.5 months von EURUSD • 1 Hour Kerzen getestet. Dieser Backtest ergab 167 Positionen, mit einer durchschnittlichen Gewinnrate von 31% und einem Risiko-Rendite-Verhältnis von 2.68. Wenn Sie annehmen, dass das 2.68 Risiko-Rendite-Verhältnis gilt, benötigen Sie eine Mindestgewinnrate von 27.2, um profitabel zu sein. Sie stehen also gut da. Die wichtigsten Metriken sind wie folgt:

  1. Gesamtrendite: Gesamtrendite: 4.00% vs 7.50% für das Asset
  2. Maximaler Drawdown: Maximaler Drawdown: -7.60% vs -9.00% für das Asset
  3. Exposition: Exposition: 53.30% Zeit im Markt
  4. Gewinnrate: Gewinnrate: 31.0%, vs 27.2% Minimum
  5. Risiko/Rendite-Verhältnis: Risiko/Rendite-Verhältnis: 2.68

Mit dieser Exposition können Sie erkennen, dass Sie bei 53% Marktzeit 53.33% des Asset-Aufwärtspotenzials und 84.44% des Asset-Abwärtspotenzials erhalten.

13/26 EMA cross: Position eingehen wenn

All of the following: # "Mike"
  60min Exponential Moving Average (13, 0, close) Crosses ↗ 60min Exponential Moving Average (26, 0, close)

13/26 EMA cross: Position verlassen wenn

All of the following: # "Kilo"
  60min Exponential Moving Average (13, 0, close) Crosses ↘ 60min Exponential Moving Average (26, 0, close)

13/26 EMA cross @ EURUSD • 1 Hour (4.0%) erklärt von Alex C, Mike, Sarah

Alex C

Autor

The backtest shows some interesting mathematical patterns, but I see several red flags that need attention. First thing I notice is the Win Rate of 31% - this looks terrible at first, but when we consider the Risk/Reward ratio of 2.68 and average win size of 0.54% versus average loss of -0.20%, the strategy actually makes mathematical sense.

The most concerning metric is the maximum losing streak of 18 trades. This would require very strict risk management and psychological strength to endure. Even though the strategy has positive expectancy of 0.1 and good win rate leeway of 30.73%, the negative Sharpe (-0.80) and Sortino (-0.85) ratios indicate suboptimal risk-adjusted returns. The market exposure of 53.3% is quite reasonable for this type of strategy.

I would suggest to implement additional filters to improve entry precision. Maybe adding RSI or other momentum indicators could help reduce the false signals. The strategy underperforms buy & hold (4.0% vs 7.5%), which is not optimal for the amount of trades it generates. But the lower drawdown (-7.6% vs -9.0%) shows it has some merit in risk management perspective. Overall, I would classify this as mathematically viable but needs optimization before real trading.

Mike

Autor

Yo fam, let me break down this EMA cross strategy on EURUSD! 🚀

The strategy's showing some interesting potential with that 4% profit, but TBH the buy & hold did better at 7.5%. What's got me hyped though is that risk/reward ratio of 2.68 - when we win, we win BIG! 💪 The win rate's only 31%, but check this out - we only needed 27.2% to break even, so we're actually crushing it on that front. That's what I call living on the edge and making it work! 🎯

The drawdown's not too scary at -7.6%, which is actually better than the market's -9%. But that 18-trade losing streak... oof, that would test anyone's diamond hands! 💎🙌 The strategy's pretty active with about 17 trades per month, which means plenty of action but not too crazy on the commissions. Looking at those monthly returns, it's been steadily climbing - that 6-month performance of 8.5% is pretty sweet!

This is giving me some serious "slow and steady wins the race" vibes. Not quite YOLO material, but definitely something I might throw some Wendy's paychecks at. Just gotta have the stomach for those losing streaks! 🍔💵

Sarah

Autor

Madre mía, this strategy is like watching paint dry, but somehow even more disappointing!

The win rate of 31% is pathetically low, even though technically it's above the minimal required 27.2%. Yes, the Risk/Reward ratio of 2.68 makes it mathematically viable, but just barely. It's like trying to cross a bridge made of dental floss - technically possible, but why would you want to?

The most alarming thing is that 18-trade losing streak. Dios mío! This would destroy most traders psychologically before they ever get to see any profit. And that -7.6% drawdown? Not terrible in isolation, but combined with the other metrics, it's like adding insult to injury.

The performance is mediocre at best - 4% net profit over 19.5 months when buy & hold gave 7.5%? This is embarassing, amigo. You're essentially paying commission and spending time to underperform the market. The negative Sharpe and Sortino ratios are just screaming "stay away" in your face.

Look, if you want to waste your time with this strategy, that's your choice. But don't come crying to me when your account bleeds slowly to death from a thousand paper cuts of small losses. There are better ways to trade EMA crosses, if you must use them at all.

Tabellarische Metriken von 13/26 EMA cross getestet auf EURUSD • 1 Hour

Gesamttrades167Nettogewinn4.0%Buy & Hold Gewinn7.5%
Gewinnrate31%Risiko/Rendite-Verhältnis2.68Maximaler Drawdown-7.6%
Asset Maximaler Drawdown-9.0%Exposition53.3%Durchschn. Kerzen in Position29.5
Sharpe-Ratio-0.80Sortino-Ratio-0.85Realisierte Volatilität4.55%
Max. Gewinnserie3Durchschn. Gewinnserie1.4Max. Verlustserie18
Durchschn. Verlustserie3.1Durchschn. Trades pro Monat17.1Durchschn. Trades pro Tag0.6
Rendite Std Dev0.5Verlust Std Dev0.1Gewinn Std Dev0.7
Erwartungswert0.1Beta0.53

Alle Backtests für 13/26 EMA cross

common.strategyExpositionLeistung vs AssetDrawdown vs AssetGewinnrateRisiko/Rendite
SPY • 10 Minutes
60%(7.3%/14.0%) 0.52x(-10.2%/-20.7%) 0.49x342.3
BTCUSDT • 1 Hour
55%(46.4%/66.0%) 0.70x(-32.0%/-30.6%) 1.05x342.6
EURUSD • 1 Hour
53%(4.0%/7.5%) 0.53x(-7.6%/-9.0%) 0.84x312.7
SPY • 1 Hour
62%(51.8%/109.4%) 0.47x(-17.6%/-35.1%) 0.50x431.9
BTCUSDT • Daily
55%(1428.5%/1223.3%) 1.17x(-57.5%/-76.6%) 0.75x485.6
EURUSD • Daily
47%(7.7%/11.3%) 0.68x(-14.5%/-23.3%) 0.62x312.9
SPY • Daily
68%(324.3%/1315.7%) 0.25x(-33.7%/-56.7%) 0.59x452.4